Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Ala. 623 - Lee v. State

Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 89 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2010 · most notably Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 60 Cal. 2d 631 - People v. Morse (1964)

2 federal appellate · 89 state decisions

3001957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Phillips v. State · Parsons v. State · Smarr v. State · Myhand v. State · Oliver v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no question but that the argument of the solicitor to the effect that a man sentenced to the penitentiary will at some time become eligible for pardon or parole was improper. . . .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “". . . was so affected by disease of the brain when the offense was committed as to render him so insane that he did not know right from wrong with respect to the particular offense charged, or by reason of such mental disease he could not resist doing the wrong; and the crime must have been the product solely of such disease of the mind."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““During the course of the direct examination of a prosecution witness, J. P. Lee, a brother of the defendant, the following transpired: “ ‘Q. Well, had you and your brother had any trouble ? A. No, sir. He meant to get me and Jack both. ■“ ‘Mr. Roberts [one of defendant’s counsel]. We ask the Court to exclude that. “ ‘The Court. Yes, what he meant to do is out, that is not evidence, gentlemen, just disregard it. “ ‘Mr. Roberts. Now we ask for a mistrial. “ ‘The Court. No, I will overrule it. “ ‘Mr. Roberts. We except.’ “The answer of the witness was not responsive to the question and the trial court acted correctly in admonishing the jury to disregard the answer, but we think the motion for mistrial was properly overruled.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.