Kirkpatrick v. First State Bank’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
June 1990
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ford v. Luria Steel & Trading Corp. · May v. Exxon Corporation · 25 F. Supp. 233 - Seagram-Distillers Corporation v. Manos · 11 N.J. Super. 567 - Elliott-Lewis Corp. v. Graeff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a general rule that the presence of a counterclaim which is shown to be sham, frivolous, or without merit is not in itself a bar to relief under summary judgment statutes and rules. On the other hand, the presence of a counterclaim predicated upon a good and substantial cause justifying a trial may bar a plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on his complaint or may preclude the court from ordering execution of the judgment pending the determination of the counterclaim. As a general thing, a claim predicated upon a good and substantial cause justifying trial is an insuperable objection to summary judgment where it is in excess of the amount demanded in the complaint....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.