Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 F.1d 120 - Clen v. Jorgensen

Clen v. Jorgensen’s Empirical Analysis

265 F. 120 · 1920

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
March 1954
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Hooven, Owens & Rentschler, Co. v. John Featherstone's Sons · Stevens v. Clark · Roberts v. Great Northern Ry. Co. · Smith v. Currie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Therefore, until Congress shall provide otherwise, we shall regard the appellate jurisdiction conferred by the recited act [Sec. 2 of the Organic Act of 1917] to be such as to enable this court to review on appeal all matters of fact and of law involved in the judgments brought here for review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.