Anderson v. Crawford’s Empirical Analysis
265 F. 504 · 1920
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2016
9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte Tobias Watkins · The United States v. Jonah Crosby · Runkle v. United States · Dynes v. Hoover · the Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon Others
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In time of war, insurrection, or rebellion, larceny, robbery, * * * murder * * * shall be punishable by the sentence of a general court-martial, when committed by persons in the military service of the United States, and the punishment in any such case shall not be less than the punishment provided, for the like offense, by the laws of the state, territory, or district in which such offense may have been committed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex parte Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.