Bluejacket v. Ewert’s Empirical Analysis
265 F. 823 · 1920
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
April 1985
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Felix v. Patrick · Kelley v. Boettcher · Schrimpscher v. Stockton · MacGreal v. Taylor · May v. Sloan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The adult plaintiffs were free to make conveyance of this land, even though they were Indians, and [since] their tribal relations had been severed, [they] were chargeable with the same diligence as white people in discovering and pursuing their legal remedies. [ Felix v. Patrick, 145 U. S. 317 (1892)]; [ Schrimpscher v. Stockton, 183 U. S. 290 (1902)].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“No person employed in Indian affairs shall have any interest or concern in any trade with the Indians, except for, and on account of, the United States,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.