Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

265 F.2d 376

Docket No. 14444.

Freudiger v. Brucker

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued January 29, 1958.

Decided March 19, 1959.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1959-03-19

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1962

2 counsel of record

Relies on Pitts v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1959-03-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Daniel Holcombe Thomas, District Judge.

Mr. Charles F. O'Neall, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. John S. Mears, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Seth H. Dubin, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of the Bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, and Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Morton Hollander, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees.

Before EDGERTON, BAZELON, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant was a civilian employee of the Department of the Army eligible for veteran's preference. He lost his position in a reduction in force and sued for reinstatement. After a trial the District Court dismissed his complaint. We find no error.

¶2

Affirmed.

/265/f2d/376 · .json · Public domain