Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 F.2d 377 - Laughlin

Laughlin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2017

3 state decisions

201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kimbrough v. United States · Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom · Murphy Auto Parts Company, Inc. v. Thomas Charles Ball, Through His Next Friend, Rita H. Ball, Murphy Auto Parts Company, Inc. v. George J. Ball, Sr., and Rita H. Ball · 22 Cal. App. 318 - Pinto v. Seely · Ellis v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the absence of a specific provision in the contract for additional fees the contract must be construed to include the services rendered on appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.