Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 F.2d 390 - Silbernagel v. Voss

Silbernagel v. Voss’s Empirical Analysis

265 F.2d 390 · 1959

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2005

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

20195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin Jacobs & Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland · Flint v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. · Bish v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. · Hamblen v. Kazlauski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, the defendant made no motion for a directed verdict at the trial; and, under well-established principles, questions as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict are not preserved on this appeal. [Citing cases.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.