Parr v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Disclosure of matters occurring before the grand jury other than its deliberations and the vote of any juror may be made to the attorneys for the government for use in the performance of their duties. Otherwise a juror, attorney, interpreter or stenographer may disclose matters occurring before the grand jury only when so directed by the court preliminarily to or in connection with a judicial proceeding or when permitted by the court at the request of the defendant upon a showing that grounds may exist for a motion to dismiss the indictment because of matters occurring before the grand jury. * * Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States, 1959, 360 U.S. 395, 398 , 79 S.Ct. 1237 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1323 ; Parr v. United States, 5 Cir., 1959, 265 F.2d 894, 902 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re Petition for Disclosure of Evidence Before the October, 1959 Grand Jury of This Court