Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

265 F.2d 927

Docket No. 13682.

Dari-Delite of Tennessee, Inc. v. Dairy Gold, Inc.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1959.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1959-04-15

2 counsel of record

Relies on Enterprise Mfg. Co. v. Shakespeare Co. · 54 F. Supp. 694 - Mathey v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation · Alliance Securities Co. v. De Vilbliss Mfg. Co.

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1959-04-15

¶1Hooker, Keeble, Dodson & Harris and Ralph F. Staubly, Nashville, Tenn., for appellant.

¶2Waller, Davis & Lansden, Nashville, Tenn., Miller, Martin, Hitching & Tip-ton, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellee.

¶3Before McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

¶4*928PER CURIAM.

¶5The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court, and the Court being duly advised, now, therefore,

¶6It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court confirming the Special Master’s Report is hereby affirmed. Enterprise Mfg. Co. v. Shakespeare Co., 6 Cir., 141 F.2d 916; Alliance Securities Co. v. DeVilbliss Mdg. Co., 6 Cir., 76 F.2d 503; Mathey v. United Shoe Machinery Corporation, D.C.Mass., 54 F.Supp. 694; DeVries v. Meyering Land Co., 248 Mich. 128, 226 N.W. 824.

/265/f2d/927 · .json · Public domain