United States of America v. Edgar Vasquez-Flores’s Empirical Analysis
265 F.3d 1122 · 2001
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Taylor v. United States · United States v. Dabeit · United States v. Edwards · Rafael Hernandez-Mancilla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a taking of property or an exercise of control over property without consent with the criminal intent to deprive the owner of rights and benefits of ownership, even if such deprivation is less than total or permanent.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“This court has jurisdiction over the appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(2) because Vasquez is appealing the district court's final sentence on the ground that it was imposed through an incorrect application of the guidelines.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Congress used the words `theft offense' rather than just `theft,' thus indicating that the phrase ought to be read to incorporate different but closely related constructions in modern state statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abimbola v. Ashcroft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.