Ph v. The School District of Kansas City Missouri’s Empirical Analysis
265 F.3d 653 · 2001
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Rost ex rel. K.C. v. Steamboat Springs RE-2 School District (2008), Russell v. Hennepin County (2005)
16 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Davis, As Next Friend of Lashonda D. v. Monroe County Board of Education et al. · Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District · Berg v. County of Allegheny
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is so likely to result in a violation of constitutional rights that the need for training is patently obvious,”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a pattern of misconduct indicates that the school district's [or, in this case, Ms. Gilyard's] responses to a regularly recurring situation are insufficient to protect the students' constitutional rights,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jennings v. Wentzville IV School District · S.J., a Minor, by T.R., Her Natural Mother and Next Friend v. Kansas City Missouri Public School District Teresia R. Gilyard, Individually and as Principal of Martin Luther King Middle School in the Kansas City Missouri Public School District William B. Evans, Individually and as Counselor of Martin Luther King Middle School in the Kansas City Missouri Public School District and Gwendolyn E. Squiers, Individually and as Vice-Principal of Martin Luther King Middle School in the Kansas City Missouri Public School District““To avoid summary judgment, the non-movant must make a sufficient showing on every essential element of its claim on which it bears the burden of proof.” Buettner v. Arch Coal Sales Co., 216 F.3d 707, 718 (8th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1077 , 121 S.Ct. 773 , 148 L.Ed.2d 672 (2001). * X * * * * P.H., as the nonmoving party, “is entitled to all reasonable inferences — those that can be drawn from the evidence without resort to speculation.” Sprenger v. Fed. Home Loan Bank of Des Moines, 253 F.3d 1106, 1110 (8th Cir. 2001) (internal quotations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.