¶1 The attorney appointed to represent Sheronda Jackson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Jackson has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Jackson’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Jackson’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
265 F. App'x 244
United States v. Jackson
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided February 8, 2008
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-02-08
Relies on Anders v. California · United States v. Cantwell
Decided 2008-02-08