¶1MEMORANDUM
¶2Dushun A. White, a California state prisoner, appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district court’s decision to deny a § 2254 *471petition, Sass v. Cal Bd. of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1126 (9th Cir.2006), and we affirm.
¶3The state’s contentions that White does not have a clearly established liberty interest in parole, and that a Certificate of Appealability is required, are foreclosed. See id. at 1127-28.
¶4White contends that the California Board of Prison Terms’ (the “Board”) 2001 decision to deem him unsuitable for parole violated his due process rights. We conclude that the Board’s decision was supported by some evidence in the record. See id. at 1128-29. Accordingly, the state court’s decision denying this claim was neither contrary to, nor based on an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Sass, 461 F.3d at 1128-29.
¶5AFFIRMED.
¶6 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.