265 F. Supp. 2d 35 - Thomas v. Principi’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 38 U.S.C. § 511 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Rosen v. Walters · Beamon v. Brown · Robinson v. Detroit News, Inc. · Price v. United States · Aguiar v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“persistent auditory hallucinosis which is troubling, so a diagnosis of schizophrenia is the most likely correct diagnosis. Some of the other adjunct symptoms are not present, however, but this will be the working diagnosis for him. He has slight social and industrial disability resulting from this.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Principi“[a] favorable decision as to plaintiff's claims would entail a finding that defendants should have provided a particular quantum of medical treatment to plaintiff that they did not in fact provide.... [S]uch a finding is flatly forbidden by § 511.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Principi“all questions of law and fact necessary to a decision by the Secretary [for Veterans Affairs] under a law that affects the provision of benefits by the Secretary to veterans.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Principi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.