Borawski v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 39 U.S.C. § 401 · 39 U.S.C. § 409
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · United States v. Mitchell · Feres v. United States · Land US v. Dollar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]redict[ing] . . . that the New Jersey Supreme Court would confine the tort of unlawful retaliation to formal personnel actions that have an effect on either compensation or job rank. . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) it is the kind that the servant is employed to perform; (2) it occurs substantially within the authorized time and space limits of employment; (3) it is actuated, at least in part, by a desire to serve the master; and (4) if force is intentionally used by the servant against another, that use of force is not unexpectable by the master.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“discharge, suspension or demotion of an employee, or other adverse employment action taken against an employee in the terms and conditions of employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.