Millard v. Rankin’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2250 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on County of Sacramento v. Lewis · Ingraham v. Wright · BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · Washington v. Glucksberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]hese sweeping registration and disclosure requirements - in the name of public safety but not linked to a finding that public safety is at risk in a particular case - are excessive in relation to [the statute's] expressed public safety objective”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. John Doe v. Rausch“resembles the supervisory aspects of parole and probation, and complements and continues the states' comprehensive supervision of registered sex offenders even after they are released from the express provisions of their parole or probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. John Doe v. Rausch“This constitutional concern ... arises out of the basic unfairness of depriving citizens of life, liberty, or property, through the application, not of law and legal processes, but of arbitrary coercion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.