Talley v. Mathis’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
August 2009
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boyd v. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc. · Cauthen v. Central Georgia Bank · Bloodworth v. Gay · Martin v. Citizens Bank · 116 Ga. App. 421 - Kelly v. Banda
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The only agreement that is alleged to have been reached ... in Georgia was for the lawful purchase in Kentucky of a ticket in that state’s lottery. The consideration for this agreement was the joint contribution of the purchase price of the ticket and the exchange of mutual promises to share in any resulting proceeds. There is nothing unlawful in either the agreement or the consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Meyer v. Hawkinson“the public policy of this state would be violated if appellant were denied the opportunity to seek to enforce the alleged agreement against appellees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dickerson v. Deno“the ticket was legally purchased with joint funds in Kentucky,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dickerson v. Deno
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.