Engram v. Engram’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Meeks (1998), 251 Ga. App. 124 - Hollifield v. Monte Vista Biblical Gardens, Inc. (2001)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins · Precise v. City of Rossville · Hoffman v. Insurance Co. of North America · 215 Ga. App. 786 - Smith v. McClung · Smith v. Cox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unjust enrichment applies when as a matter of fact there is no legal contract, but when the party sought to be charged has been conferred a benefit by the party contending an unjust enrichment which the benefitted party equitably ought to return or compensate for.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he undisputed evidence shows that the parties never intended that appellees be responsible for the cost of the bedroom addition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.