Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Ga. 897 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Barnes v. State (1998), Turner v. State (1996)

70 state decisions

4201995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Georgia v. McCollum · Gamble v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]o say that a trial judge may choose to disbelieve a silly or superstitious reason at Step 3 is quite different from [the Eighth Circuit] saying that a trial judge must terminate the inquiry at step 2 when the race-neutral reason is silly or superstitious.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Unless a discriminatory intent is inherent in the ... proponent's explanation [for a strike], the reason offered will be deemed race neutral.' [Cits.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he burden of production [then] shifts to the proponent of the strike to come forward with a race-neutral explanation (step 2). If a race-neutral explanation is tendered, the trial court must then decide (step 3) whether the opponent of the strike has proved purposeful racial discrimination. [Cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.