Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Ga. App. 242 - State v. Lucas

265 Ga. App. 242 - State v. Lucas’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Stansbury v. California · Watson v. State · McAllister v. State · 222 Ga. App. 372 - State v. Brannan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The issue of whether one is in custody for Miranda purposes is a mixed question of law and fact, and the trial court's determination will not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re TAG
  2. “Under Miranda, persons must be advised of their rights against self-incrimination after being taken into custody or otherwise deprived of their freedom of action in any significant way.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re TAG

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.