Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Ga. App. 756 - Smith v. State

265 Ga. App. 756 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Milam v. State · 244 Ga. App. 500 - McElroy v. State · 165 Ga. App. 881 - Sims v. State · 262 Ga. App. 806 - Mitchell v. State · Bridges v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, the need, breadth, and formation of additional jury instructions are left to the sound discretion of the trial court. When the jury requests more instructions upon a particular phase of the case, the trial court is under a duty to instruct them in a plain, clear manner so as to enlighten rather than confuse them. The court may respond to a jury's question by repeating charges which are legally sufficient and not misleading. But it is not necessarily error for the court to respond with a direct answer. The critical issue is whether the charge taken as a whole presents the issues in a way not likely to confuse a jury of average intelligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.