Rosell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently December 1995 · most notably Loyd v. State (1980), Works v. State (1977)
76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baker v. State · Baum v. State · Easton v. State · Turner v. State · FULLER v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"When the sufficiency of the evidence is raised as an issue upon appeal, this Court will consider only that evidence of probative value most favorable to the State, together with all logical and reasonable inferences which may be drawn therefrom. If such evidence and inferences would permit a reasonable trier of fact to find the existence of each element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt, the verdict will not be disturbed." Baum v. State, (1976) Ind., 345 N.E.2d 831 at 834, 835 , and cases there cited. "As this Court has repeatedly emphasized, it will not on appeal judge the weight of the evidence or the credibility of the witnesses. Lottie v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 124 , 311 N.E.2d 800 ; Brown v. State, (1974) 261 Ind. 619 , 308 N.E.2d 699 ; Turner v. State, (1972) 259 Ind. 344 , 287 N.E.2d 339 ; Gibson v. State, (1971) 257 Ind. 23 , 271 N.E.2d 706 ; Fuller v. State, (1971) 256 Ind. 681 , 271 N.E.2d 720 ." Rosell v. State, (1976) Ind., 352 N.E.2d 750, 751 .”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Shutt v. State · Fair v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.