Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Ind. 262 - Warner v. State

Warner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2012 · most notably Maldonado v. State (1976), Bean v. State (1978)

51 state decisions

31019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Hopt v. People of the Territory of Utah · Beazell v. State of Ohio Chatfield · Lindsey v. State of Washington · Cummings v. The State of Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the statute provides for an increase in punishment or deprives appellant of a possible avenue of lesser punishment, it is an ex post facto law.” Warner v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 262, 267 , 354 N.E.2d 178, 182 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Article 1, § 10, cl. 1, of the United States Constitution and Art. 1, § 24, of the Indiana Constitution prohibit the State from passing any ex post facto law. The ex post facto prohibition applies only to laws which deprive a person accused or convicted of a crime of a substantial personal right which he would have had at the time he committed the offense. . . ” 265 Ind. at 267 , 354 N.E.2d at 182 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a benefit which provided a form of punishment considered lesser or more desirable, if it was available at the time of the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.