Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Ind. 316 - Ashby v. State

Ashby v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

88 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably Ortiz v. State (1976), Works v. State (1977)

88 state decisions

49019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Malloy v. Hogan · Bram v. United States · Rogers v. Richmond · Smith v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘A coerced confession claim, whether founded on a promise of immunity or otherwise, always involves this question: did the governmental conduct complained of “bring about” a confession “not freely self-determined”?’ 371 U.S. at 348 , 83 S.Ct. at 453 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"[I]n considering whether the State has met its burden, `We will consider the evidence which supports the decision of the trier of fact in the case of contested evidence, and any uncontested evidence presented by the appellant.'" Citing Magley v. State, (1975) 263 Ind. 618 , 335 N.E.2d 811, 818 . 265 Ind. 316, 321 , 354 N.E.2d 192, 195 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The confession of a defendant made under inducement, with all the circumstances, may be given in evidence against him, except when made under the influence of fear produced by threats or by intimidation or undue influences; but a confession made under inducement is not sufficient to warrant a conviction without corroborating evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.