Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Kan. 104 - State v. McKinney

State v. McKinney’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dusky v. United States · Medina v. California · Cooper v. Oklahoma · State v. Prouse · State v. Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “snatching the purse away from [the victim] constituted the threat of bodily harm, which is an element of robbery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “McKinney told police that he had snatched [the victim's] purse from her arm, but he denied pushing her,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “argue[d] that the jury should have been instructed on theft as a lesser included offense of robbery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.