State v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 70 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably State v. Holmes (2004), State v. Lumley (1999)
2 federal appellate · 70 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Estelle v. Williams · State v. Childers · State v. Dunn · State v. Alderson · State v. Bailey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘a trial court must instruct the jury on the law applicable to the defendant’s theories for which there is supporting evidence. When considering the refusal of the trial court to give a specific instruction, the evidence must be viewed ... in the light most favorable to the party requesting the instruction.’ ” 268 Kan. at 168 (quoting State v. Scott, 250 Kan. 350 , Syl. ¶ 4, 827 P.2d 733 [1992]).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Saleem · State v. Trussell“`it is clear that our standard of review regarding a trial court's admission of evidence, subject to exclusionary rules, is abuse of discretion'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘A party must make a timely and specific objection to the admission of evidence at trial in order to preserve the issue for appeal. K.S.A. 60-404 states that a verdict or finding shall not be set aside, nor shall the judgment or decision based thereon be reversed, by reason of the erroneous admission of evidence unless there appears of record objection to the evidence timely interposed and so stated as to make clear the specific ground of objection. [Citation omitted.]’ ” State v. Sims, 265 Kan. 166, 174 , 960 P.2d 1271 (1998).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.