Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Kan. 179 - Moritz Implement Co. v. Matthews

Moritz Implement Co. v. Matthews’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc. · Snodgrass v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · 154 Ill. App. 3d 6 - Anna National Bank v. Prater · United States v. Newcomb · Brendle v. Hudson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although interests in real estate are excluded from Article 9 by § 9-104(j), “crops” are brought back within the scope of Article 9 by definition. Therefore, the real estate mortgagee should be considered unperfected as to the crops. In other words, Article 9 is the exclusive statutory scheme to cover security interests in growing crops, and the mortgagee should not be able to claim a security interest under real estate law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.