Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Ky. 1 - Lewallen v. Mays

Lewallen v. Mays’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2006

12 state decisions

6019361940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Elam v. City of Mt. Sterling · Carter v. Elk Coal Co. · Abbott v. Perkinson · Hall v. Pratt · Hopkins v. Layne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Land claimed to a well-defined boundary such as a fence, as in this case, if the possession thereof is open, notorious, adverse, and continuous for a period of 15 years or more, such possession is sufficient to sustain the claim of title by adverse possession.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.