Smiley v. Atkinson

SMILEY ET AL. v. ATKINSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADM'X OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN C. ATKINSON ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 20, 1972.

Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1972-03-20

Relies on 12 Md. App. 543 - Smiley v. Atkinson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-03-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2004 · most notably 21 Ariz. App. 465 - Castillo v. Industrial Commission (1974), Holste v. Burlington Northern Railroad (1999)

28 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

¶2Robert B. Barnhouse, with whom were James P. Gillece, Jr., and Piper & Marbury on the brief, for appellants.

¶3 *130 Clayton A. Dietrich, Chief Assistant City Solicitor, on motion to dismiss for Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, part of appellees. Max R. Israelson, with whom were Joseph I. Pines, Harry A.E. Taylor and Israelson, Pines & Jackson on the brief, for other appellees.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5This Court adopts the opinion of Judge Powers in Smiley v. Atkinson, Adm'x, 12 Md. App. 543 (1971), and therefore affirms the judgments appealed from.

¶6Judgments affirmed with costs.