Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Mich. App. 616 - People v. Meshell

265 Mich. App. 616 - People v. Meshell’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “With respect to manufacturing methamphetamine, the elements are (1) the defendant manufactured a controlled substance, (2) the substance manufactured was methamphetamine, and (3) the defendant knew he was manufacturing methamphetamine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The element of possession ... requires a showing of dominion or right of control over the drug with knowledge of its presence and character.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a person shall not manufacture, create, deliver, or possess with intent to manufacture, create, or deliver a controlled substance. ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.