Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 MINN 111 - Sprader v. Mueller

Sprader v. Mueller’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

6 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably 38 Ill. 2d 528 - McElroy v. Force (1967), Bakke v. Rainbow Club, Inc. (1975)

6 district · 20 state decisions

90196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co. · Schmitt v. Emery · State v. Anderson · Nelson v. Ackermann · 41 Tenn. App. 246 - Moore v. Watkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is axiomatic that an attorney enjoys broad authority in dealing with the proce dural aspects of his client’s cause. In modern practice pretrial discovery has resulted in the routine exchange of information on a voluntary basis to obviate the expense of taking formal depositions. We believe that within limits which do not offend our sense of professional propriety (however elusive this definition of the rule may prove to be), an attorney has the right to use privileged matter for legitimate bargaining purposes. In so doing, he may waive the privilege without committing any breach of his ethical obligation to respect his client’s confidences.” (Italics supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Since the attorney has implied authority from the client (§ 1063 supra) to make admissions and otherwise to act in all that concerns the management of the cause, all disclosures (oral or written) voluntarily made to the opposing party or to third persons in the course of negotiations for settlement, or in the course of taking adverse steps in litigation (e. g., in serving notices), are receivable as being made under an implied waiver of privilege, giving authority to disclose the confidences when necessary in the opinion of the attorney. This is so unless it appears that the attorney has acted in bad faith toward the client.” (Italics supplied in part.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.