Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 N.C. 173 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Jackson v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment (1969), In Re: Joseph Lee Moore (1976)

3 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

240196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Skinner v. State of Oklahoma Williamson · Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank · State v. Ballance · McIntyre v. Clarkson · Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant having pleaded guilty, his appeal could not call in question the facts charged nor the regularity and correctness in form of the warrant. * * * He is concluded as to these. * * * The appeal could only bring up for review the question whether the facts charged, and of which the defendant admitted himself to have been guilty, constitute an offense punishable under the laws and Constitution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Due process’ has a dual significance, as it pertains to procedure and substantive law. As to procedure it means ‘notice and an opportunity to be heard and to defend in an orderly proceed ing adapted to the nature of the case before a competent and impartial tribunal having jurisdiction of the cause.’ 12 Am. Jur. 267 , § 573; 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 569, p. 1156.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.