Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

265 N.C. 562

Dull v. Dull

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1965

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1965-11-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2000

2 state decisions

Relies on City of Goldsboro v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. · Griffin v. Griffin · Hardee v. Mitchell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1965-11-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER Cubiam.

¶1The appellant did not except to the facts found by the court below, and the findings of fact are sufficient to support the order entered below. Goldsboro v. R. R., 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d 486. Where no exceptions have been taken to the findings of fact, such findings are presumed to be correct and are binding on appeal. Goldsboro v. R. R., supra,and cited cases.

¶2Orders for the support of minor children are subject to modification upon a proper showing of a change of conditions. Blankenship v. Blankenship, 256 N.C. 638, 124 S.E. 2d 857; Griffin v. Griffin, 237 N.C. 404, 75 S.E. 2d 133; Hardee v. Mitchell, 230 N.C. 40, 51 S.E. 2d 884.

¶3The judgment from which this appeal was taken is

¶4Affirmed.

/265/nc/562 · .json · Public domain