Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Neb. 232 - State v. Loyd

State v. Loyd’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. · Vega v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. · Jacobson v. Solid Waste Agency · State v. Kubik · Arrow Club, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The power of a municipality to enact and enforce any ordinance must be authorized by state statute. . . . Thus, a city may not pass legislation which conflicts, or is inconsistent, with state law. ... An ordinance may not permit or license that which a statute forbids or prohibits, and vice versa. . . . Where there is a direct conflict between an ordinance and a state statute, the statute is superior law. ... A city ordinance is inconsistent with a statute if it is contradictory in the sense that the two legislative provisions cannot coexist. . . . When an ordinance is inconsistent with statutory law, it is unenforceable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.