Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 N.J. Super. 482 - State v. Rolle

265 N.J. Super. 482 - State v. Rolle’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. States · State v. Hall · State v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An order for investigative detention shall be issued only if the judge concludes from the application that: (a) a crime has been committed and is under active investigation, and (b) these is a reasonable and well-grounded basis from which to believe that the person sought may have committed the crime, and (e) the results of the physical characteristics obtained during the detention will significantly advance the investigation and determine whether or not the individual probably committed the crime, and (d) the physical characteristics sought cannot otherwise practicably be obtained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]nvestigative detention orders may be used only to compel a defendant “to submit to non-testimonial identification procedures for the purpose of obtaining evidence of his or her physical characteristics ...” Police investigatory procedures undertaken pursuant to the authority of an investigative detention order which exceed this narrow scope are not only illegally unwarranted but also abuse a closely demarcated process designed for limited salutary purposes. Evidence obtained as a result of such conduct must be suppressed. Id. at 488 , 627 A.2d 1157 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.