Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 N.J. Super. 528 - State v. Vasquez

265 N.J. Super. 528 - State v. Vasquez’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2011

24 state decisions

120199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jenkins v. Anderson · Musser v. States · State v. Roth · State v. Ramseur · State v. MacOn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court's failure to charge self-defense sua sponte did not amount to plain error. Defense counsel chose a strategy which the trial court appropriately decided not to interfere with. Any charge on self-defense would have prejudiced defendant and increased the likelihood of the murder conviction.... [ Ibid. ]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n light of the fact that the trial court instructed the jury on murder, aggravated manslaughter, passion/provocation manslaughter, and reckless manslaughter, no need arose for the judge to charge on imperfect self-defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the remarks, if improper, substantially prejudiced the defendant['s] fundamental right to have the jury fairly evaluate the merits of [his] defense, and thus had a clear capacity to bring about an unjust result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.