Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 NW2D 316 - State v. Aumann

State v. Aumann’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2009

6 state decisions

401978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullaney v. Wilbur · Drope v. Missouri · Leland v. Oregon · Davis v. United States · Rivera v. Delaware

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not for us to consider the wisdom or folly of any legislative act. We lack the power to declare a statute void unless it is plainly and without doubt repugnant to the provisions of the constitution upon which the constitutional challenge is based.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.