State v. Strimling’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably State v. Pieschke (1980), State v. Oevering (1978)
45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cree v. Goldstein · State v. Thompson · 24 Wis. 2d 527 - State v. Nutley · Bennett v. United States · State v. Norgaard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendants jointly charged may be tried jointly or separately, in the discretion of the court. In all cases, any one or more of said defendants may be convicted or acquitted.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hathaway · State v. Eaton“Where the accused played at least some knowing role in the commission of the crime and takes no steps to thwart its completion, the jury may properly infer the requisite mens rea for a conviction in aiding and abetting.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A person is criminally liable for a crime committed by another if he intentionally aids, advises, hires, counsels, or conspires with or otherwise procures the other to commit the crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Boyd · State v. Volk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.