Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 Pa. Super. 429 - Commonwealth v. Lochman

265 Pa. Super. 429 - Commonwealth v. Lochman’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
December 1994
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 1994

23 state decisions

170197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney · Commonwealth v. Dancer · Commonwealth v. Mabie · Commonwealth v. Gee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the petitioner knowingly and understanding^ failed to raise it and it could have been raised before the trial, at the trial, on appeal, in a habeas corpus proceeding or any other proceeding actually conducted, or in a prior proceeding actually initiated under this act; and (2) the petitioner is unable to prove the existence of extraordinary circumstances to justify his failure to raise the issue. 19 Pa.C.S.A. § 1180 4(b) (Supp. Pamphlet 1965-1980). Moreover, There is a rebuttable presumption that a failure to appeal a ruling or to raise an issue is a knowing and understanding failure. Id. § 1180-4(c) (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) Mandatory: In all court cases, on request by the defendant, and subject to any protective order which the Commonwealth might obtain under this rule, the Commonwealth shall disclose to the defendant’s attorney all of the following requested items or information, provided they are material to the instant case. The Commonwealth shall, when applicable, permit the defendant’s attorney to inspect and copy or photograph such items. (a) Any evidence favorable to the accused which is material either to guilt or to punishment, and which is within the possession or control of the attorney for the Commonwealth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““(1) The petitioner knowingly and understandingly failed to raise it and it could have been raised before the trial, at the trial, on appeal, in a habeas corpus proceeding or any other proceeding actually conducted, or in a prior proceeding actually initiated under this Act; and (2) The petitioner is unable to prove the existence of extraordinary circumstances to justify his failure to raise the issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.