Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 SO2D 801 - Johnson v. Sweat

Johnson v. Sweat’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2003
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2003

7 state decisions

501972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hope v. Madison · State v. American Sugar Refining Co. · Laenger v. Laenger · Himel v. Connely · In Re Craven

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “". . ., our later cases make it clear that the common law doctrine of estoppel by judgment is not recognized in Louisiana." Johnson v. Sweat, 265 So.2d 801 at 802 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1972) writ denied 263 La. 105 , 267 So.2d 211 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “judgment dismissing plaintiffs' second suit on an exception of prescription of one year cannot sustain the plea of res judicata in the first suit, which was timely filed and in which no issue is presented as to prescription.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Res Judicata, Matters Which Might Have Been Pleaded”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.