Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 S.W. 425 - Durham v. McDowell

Durham v. McDowell’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 1993
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1993

8 state decisions

2019241930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Security Nat. Bank of Dallas v. Kynerd · Brokaw v. Collett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The relation of principal and surety is always a matter of agreement between the parties, expressed in terms or implied by their conduct or the circumstances. The relation never arises by mere operation of law, but is the result of an express agreement between the parties, or a contract which may be fairly implied from the situation in which the parties have intentionally placed themselves. 1 Brandt on Suretyship (3d Ed.) § 1.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.