Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 S.W.3d 28 - Doyle v. State

Doyle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Guzman v. State · Carmouche v. State · Highwarden v. State · Villarreal v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wjhen the weave took place, the officer [was] a few car lengths away and he [was] compelled to stop his car for ... his own safety reason.... Officer Pe-rales had reasonable suspicion ... that 545.060 had been committed. Therefore, he had a valid reason to detain him on a reasonable suspicion on the traffic violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We review de novo those 'mixed questions of law and fact’ that do not turn on an evaluation of credibility and demeanor.” Doyle, 265 S.W.3d at 31 (quoting Johnson v. State, 68 S.W.3d 644, 652-53 (Tex.Crim.App.2002)). . Article 38.23 provides,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.