Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

265 S.W.3d 880

State v. Baugh

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 2008

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2008-10-07

Relies on State v. Johnson

Decided 2008-10-07

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Calvin L. Baugh appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction and sentence, arguing the trial court erred in admitting irrelevant evidence of uncharged crimes. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no error resulting in a manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice occurred. Rule 30.20 1 ; State v. Johnson, 220 S.W.3d 377, 385 (Mo.App. E.D.2007). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

¶3 . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2007, unless otherwise indicated.

/265/sw3d/880 · .json · Public domain