Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 U.S. 144 - Hecht v. Malley

Hecht v. Malley’s Empirical Analysis

265 U.S. 144 · 1924

Citation profile

574
cited by 574 later decisions
52
cited 52 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

190 federal appellate · 54 district · 60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 574 later decisions (52 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Shapiro v. United States (1948), Navarro Savings Assn. v. Lee (1980)

190 federal appellate · 54 district · 60 state decisions — followed in 17 states

246019241930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMalley v. Howard (from First Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. · Gould v. Gould · United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Co · United States v. Merriam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 574 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “appears to be used in the Act in its ordinary meaning. It has been defined as a term”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Even in the absence of any control by the beneficiaries, where the trustees are not restricted to the mere collection of funds and their payment to the beneficiaries, but are associated together with similar or greater powers than the directors in a corporation for the purpose of carrying on some business enterprise, the trust is an association within the meaning of the statute.””
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The issuance of certificates evidencing beneficial interests in the property and profits of the trust is one of the characteristic features of the Massachusetts or business trust. ‘These certificates, which resemble certificates for shares of stock in a corporation and are issued and transferred in like manner, entitle the holders to share ratably in the income of the property, and, upon termination of the trust, in the proceeds.’ “The trust instrument often prescribes the terms and conditions of certificates of shares to be issued, which are similar in form and substance to corporate shares. “Transferable certificates of shares in a business trust ‘are equitable choses in action bearing a close resemblance to certificates of stock in a corporation.’ The certificate is a muniment of title and evidence of ownership of stock. It has been said that such certificates are not chattels, but are evidence of intangible rights which have some of the characteristic qualities of chattels. “The interest of a shareholder in a business trust has been said to be personalty and not real estate, although the trust estate consists largely of real property, and notwithstanding the frequent statement that shareholders have an equitable interest in the trust property.””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.