Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 265 U.S. 57 - Hester v. United States

Hester v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

265 U.S. 57 · 1924

Citation profile

2,431
cited by 2,431 later decisions
102
cited 102 times by the Supreme Court
49
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

715 federal appellate · 134 district · 1,145 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,431 later decisions (102 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably Katz v. United States (1967), Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics (1971)

715 federal appellate · 134 district · 1,145 state decisions — followed in 49 states

625019241930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox

Cited together with Katz v. United States · Oliver v. United States · Jones v. United States · Boyd v. United States · Carroll v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,431 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their 'persons, houses, papers, and effects,' is not extended to the open fields. The distinction between the latter and the house is as old as the common law.”
    57 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The protection of the Fourth Amendment securing people in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizure does not apply to `open fields.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.