¶1*890Crapser, Heffeman and Sehenek, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Bliss, J., dissent upon the ground that chapter 142 of the Laws of 1938 constituted a change in plans on the part of the State and under the contract claimant was entitled to receive the actual cost of the discarded plans.
266 A.D. 889
Dusenbury v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 30, 1943
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1943-06-30
Decided 1943-06-30