¶1—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered May 28, 1998, denying defendants’ motion to vacate their default, and order, same court and Justice, entered August 25, 1998, directing entry of judgment in the sum of $139,335, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion to vacate granted.
¶2Given our preference for disposition of cases on the merits (see, Santora & McKay v Mazzella, 211 AD2d 460, 463; DFI Communications v Golden Penn Theatre Ticket Serv., 87 AD2d 778, 779), we find that Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying defendants’ motion to vacate their default where they had demonstrated both a meritorious defense to this action and a reasonable excuse for their default. In this regard, counsel’s actual engagement in Family Court constituted a reasonable excuse for the default under the circumstances (Abate v Long, 261 AD2d 252; Salerno v Geller, 260 AD2d 153). Concur — Williams, J. P., Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.