Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 Ala. 41 - Watson v. State

Watson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2000 · most notably Espey v. State (1960), 370 So. 2d 1115 - Nix v. State (1979)

28 state decisions

80195719601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cross v. State · Pilley v. State · Coats v. State · Burkett v. State · Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A mistrial will not be granted on motion of defendant where the court has sustained his objections to alleged improper argument and excluded it from the jury's consideration, unless it clearly appears that the defendant's rights have been so prejudiced as to render a fair trial a matter of grave doubt.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “' Jackson v. State, 33 Ala.App. 42 , 31 So.2d 514, 519 , certiorari denied 249 Ala. 348 , 31 So.2d 519 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.