Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 266 Ark. 162 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
6
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably Jones v. State (1980), Misskelley v. State (1996)

66 state decisions

45019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pope v. State · Patterson v. Georgia · Stout v. State · Clark v. State · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person is justified in using deadly physical force upon another person if the person reasonably believes that the other person is: (1) Committing or about to commit a felony involving force or violence; (2) Using or about to use unlawful deadly physical force; or (3) Imminently endangering the person’s life or imminently about to victimize the person as described in § 9-15-103 from the continuation of a pattern of domestic abuse. (b) A person may not use deadly physical force in self-defense if the person knows that he or she can avoid the necessity of using deadly physical force with complete safety: (1)(A) Byretreating. (B) However, a person is not required to retreat if the person is: (i) In the person’s dwelling or on the curtilage surrounding the person’s dwelling and was not the original aggressor; [[Image here]] (c)As used in this section: (1) “Curtilage” means the land adjoining a dwelling that is convenient for residential purposes and habitually used for residential purposes, but not necessarily enclosed, and includes an outbuilding that is directly and intimately connected with the dwelling and in close proximity to the dwelling[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.